FACTPROP · Research project

Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating

Anonymous Authors

Anonymous Institution

Popular knowledge is more vulnerable to collateral corruption—and propagates update errors farther. PopAnchor reduces the damage.

Project overview

Comparison of updating a popular fact and a rare fact, followed by the PopAnchor mitigation.
Knowledge updates create structural ripples. Updating a popular fact produces more collateral flips than updating a rare fact; PopAnchor preserves a small set of high-connectivity facts to limit propagation.

Interactive demo

FACTPROP Explorer

Paste a sentence or upload a small dataset to inspect the structural popularity of entities found in the browser index. This explorer reports graph connectivity; it does not predict an individual model’s error rate.

Browser-based analysis

How popular is your knowledge?

Loading graph index…

What this measures: structural popularity inside FACTPROP—the number of verified forward facts pointing to an entity. It is not search frequency, public awareness, or cultural popularity.

Experimental English label matching, case-insensitive. Use canonical entity names for reproducible scores. Context rules cover limited ambiguities; translations, abbreviations, typos, and some common words may not resolve correctly.

Try:

Matched entities will appear here with their object in-degree and structural tier.

Abstract

Updating a language model through fine-tuning keeps its knowledge current, but can also corrupt facts it previously answered correctly. We ask a structural question: among facts already encoded by the model, which ones are most vulnerable to collateral damage, and which updates spread the most errors?

We construct FACTPROP, a verified Wikipedia-derived factual graph whose triples are connected through shared entities, then trace correct-to-incorrect flips across graph distances after controlled updates. Across four open-weight models, high-connectivity knowledge is consistently more vulnerable and its updates have a broader downstream impact. Based on this finding, we introduce PopAnchor, a lightweight rehearsal strategy that preserves a small set of popular facts during updating and reduces forgetting.

Method

From factual structure to measurable ripples

FACTPROP makes the neighborhood around each fact explicit, allowing us to measure how a local update changes knowledge one to five graph hops away.

01

Build FACTPROP

Expand Wikipedia facts and verify candidate triples against Wikidata.

02

Apply an update

Fine-tune on a controlled factual statement while retaining a fixed evaluation set.

03

Trace the flips

Measure correct-to-wrong changes from immediate neighbors through distance five.

04

Anchor popular facts

Rehearse a compact, structurally chosen set to reduce collateral forgetting.

100,015entities
432,562verified factual edges
39relation types
d = 1…5graph hops evaluated

We define an entity’s structural popularity by its forward-edge object in-degree: the number of verified facts that point to it. This is a graph property, not a claim about cultural importance.

Results

Connectivity and error propagation

Across the evaluated models, graph connectivity is associated with both vulnerability to collateral errors and the extent of error propagation.

01 · Propagation
Flip rate by graph distance for four language models.
Errors remain measurable across five graph hops. Correct-to-wrong flips are not confined to immediate neighbors of the updated fact.
02 · Vulnerability
Flip rates for popular and rare knowledge across four language models.
Popular facts flip more often. The effect appears across all four evaluated models, with a gap of up to 11.6 percentage points.
03 · Mitigation
Average FACTPROP flip rate with no anchor, a rare anchor, and PopAnchor.
PopAnchor reduces forgetting. On Qwen3.5-9B, average FACTPROP flip rate falls from 79.8% to 68.0% across distances 1–5.

Citation

The paper is currently under review. Please use this temporary project citation until the public preprint is available.

@article{anonymous2026popular,
  title  = {Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating},
  author = {Anonymous Authors},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Under review}
}